Assignments in IGNOU
We provide you, IGNOU Solved Assignment 2022-23 Free MHI09 in PDF file with all 10 questions. You can score 90+ marks.
IGNOU Solved Assignment Free 2022-23 MHI09, If you are looking for IGNOU Solved Assignment 2022-2023 session for MA History. Then this is the right place for you. Because here I will provide you with IGNOU Solved Assignment Free 2022-23 MHI09 in Pdf file.
Last Date of Submission of Assignment
- July 2022 Session Students 30 April 2023.(Extended date)
- January 2023 Session Students 31 October 2023
IGNOU Solved Assignment 2022-23 Free
MHI09 (Indian National Movement)
Compare the views of Marxist historians and Subaltern Studies on Indian nationalism.
Marxist historians and
Subaltern Studies both offer unique perspectives on Indian nationalism, but
they also have some similarities and differences in their views.
|
Marxist Historians |
Subaltern Studies |
|
Indian nationalism is a byproduct of
capitalism and imperialism. |
Indian nationalism emerged from the struggles
of subaltern classes. |
|
The Indian bourgeoisie played a key role in
the national movement. |
The dominant nationalist discourse often
ignored the subaltern classes and their struggles. |
|
Nationalism was driven by the needs of the
capitalist class. |
The nationalist movement was characterized by
multiple and diverse social forces. |
|
The masses had limited agency in the
nationalist movement. |
The subaltern classes played an important
role in the nationalist movement |
On the other hand, Subaltern Studies offers a different perspective on Indian nationalism. Subaltern Studies is a subfield of postcolonial studies that focuses on the voices and experiences of marginalized groups, such as peasants, workers, and women. According to Subaltern Studies, Indian nationalism was not only a product of class struggle but also a product of the struggles of these marginalized groups. They argue that the Indian nationalist movement was not led solely by the bourgeoisie, but also by the subalterns, who sought to overthrow British colonial rule in order to gain social and political rights for themselves.
Despite these differences, both Marxist historians and Subaltern Studies agree that Indian nationalism was a product of the struggles of the Indian people against British colonial rule. Both perspectives also acknowledge that the Indian nationalist movement was not a unified movement, but rather a diverse movement that included different classes and groups.
However, there are also some significant differences between the views of Marxist historians and Subaltern Studies on Indian nationalism. For example, Marxist historians tend to focus on the role of the bourgeoisie in the Indian nationalist movement, while Subaltern Studies focus on the role of the subalterns. Additionally, Marxist historians tend to view Indian nationalism as a product of class struggle, while Subaltern Studies view it as a product of the struggles of marginalized groups.
Another key difference between the two perspectives is their understanding of the role of the Indian National Congress. Marxist historians view the Indian National Congress as a vehicle for the bourgeoisie to gain power and establish their dominance over the working classes and the peasantry. On the other hand, Subaltern Studies argues that the Indian National Congress was also a platform for the subalterns to voice their demands and struggles.
In conclusion, both Marxist
historians and Subaltern Studies offer unique perspectives on Indian
nationalism. While they share some similarities, such as the view that Indian
nationalism was a product of the struggles of the Indian people against British
colonial rule, they also have some significant differences in their views on
the role of the bourgeoisie, the subalterns, and the Indian National Congress.
Read More..IGNOU Solved Assignment Free 2022-23 MHI10
Write a note on economic nationalism with special reference to Indian thinkers.
Economic nationalism is a
school of thought that emphasizes the importance of protecting and promoting
the economic interests of a nation. This can be achieved through various
measures such as tariffs, import substitution, and government intervention in
the economy. Economic nationalism is particularly relevant in developing
countries, where the economy is often dominated by foreign companies and the
domestic industries are not able to compete effectively.
In India, economic nationalism has been a prominent idea since the country's independence in 1947. Indian thinkers have long emphasized the importance of protecting and promoting the domestic economy in order to achieve self-reliance and economic development.
|
|
Mahatma Gandhi |
Jawaharlal Nehru |
|
Economic aim |
Economic freedom through self-sufficiency |
Economic development through industrialization and infrastructure
development |
|
Approach |
Promoting Indian-made products and boycotting foreign goods |
Prioritizing domestic industries over foreign trade and investment |
|
Importance |
Economic independence is closely tied to political independence |
Economic development is essential for India's progress |
One of the key Indian
thinkers associated with economic nationalism is Jawaharlal Nehru, the first
prime minister of independent India. Nehru was a strong advocate of import
substitution and industrialization as a means of achieving self-reliance and
economic development. He believed that the key to economic growth was the
development of heavy industry, such as steel and iron production, and the
promotion of domestic industries through tariffs and other measures.
Another prominent Indian
thinker associated with economic nationalism is Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi was a
strong advocate of "swadeshi," or self-reliance, and believed that
the key to economic development was the promotion of small-scale industries and
the use of indigenous materials and technologies. He also believed in the
importance of protecting the rights of workers and promoting rural development.
In the post-independence
period, Indian economic thinking has been dominated by the Nehruvian model of
development, which emphasizes the role of the state in promoting
industrialization and self-reliance. This model has been criticized by some for
its emphasis on government intervention in the economy and its lack of focus on
market-oriented solutions.
In recent years, there has
been a renewed interest in economic nationalism in India. The Indian government
has been taking steps to promote domestic industries and protect the domestic
economy from foreign competition. This has included measures such as tariffs on
imported goods, subsidies for domestic industries, and the promotion of
"Make in India" initiatives.
However, economic nationalism
in India has also been criticized for its negative effects on the economy. The
protectionist measures have resulted in inefficiencies and a lack of
competition, which has led to higher prices for consumers and a lack of
innovation. Additionally, the focus on import substitution has resulted in a
lack of access to foreign technology and expertise, which has hindered the
growth of Indian industries.
Overall, economic nationalism
is a complex idea that has been central to Indian thinking on economic
development. It has been championed by prominent Indian thinkers such as
Jawaharlal Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi as a means of achieving self-reliance and
economic development. However, it has also been criticized for its negative
effects on the economy, such as inefficiencies and lack of competition. As
such, a balance needs to be struck between protecting the domestic economy and
promoting economic growth.
Below is the Link for Assignment:
IGNOU Solved Assignment Free 2022-23 MHI08
IGNOU Solved Assignment Free 2022-23 MHI06
IGNOU Solved Assignment Free 2022-23 MHI03
0 Comments